| 本条目包含过多不是中文的内容，欢迎协助翻译。 若已有相当内容译为中文，可迳自去除本模板。 |
《泰晤士报》2010年英国大学排行榜（TIMes Online:2010 University Rankings）
《泰晤士报》2010年英国大学排行榜概述
Universities were ranked aCCOrding to measures in eight key PErformance areas; Student Satisfaction, Research Quality, Entry Standards, Student-Staff Ratios, Services & Facilities Spend, Completion, Good Honours and Graduate PRospects.
All sources of the raw DATa used in the table are in the public domain. The National Student Survey (NSS) was the source of the Student Satisfaction data. This was an initiative undertaken by the Funding Councils for England, Northern Ireland and Wales designed, as an element of the quality assurance for higher education, to inform prospective students and their advisers in choosing what and where to study. The survey encompasses the views of final year students on the quality of their courses.
The information regarding Research Quality was sourced from the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise, a peer review exercise to EVAluate the quality of research in UK higher education institutions undertaken by the UK higher education funding bodies. The previous Research Assessment Exercise took place in 2001. Staffing data supplied by HESA were also used to evaluate the extent to which the research ratings related to total academic staff.
Entry Standards, Student-Staff Ratios, Services & Facilities Spend, Completion, Good Honours and Graduate Prospects data were supplied by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) which provides a system of data collection, analysis, and dissemination in relation to higher education in the whole of the United Kingdom. The original sources of data for these measures are data returns made by the universities themselves to HESA.
The provISIon of the data by the above sources DOEs not necessarily imply agreement with the data transformation and construction of the table. Universities were provided with sets of their own HESA data, which form the basis of the table, in advance of publication and were offered the opportunity to check the information. Some universities supplied replaCEMent corrected data.
In building the table, scores for Student Satisfaction and Research Quality were weighted by 1.5; all other indicators were weighted by 1. The indicators were comBIned using a z-score transformation and the totals were transformed to a scale with 1000 for the top score. For Entry Standards, Good Honours and Graduate Prospects the score was adjusted for subject mix.
The detailed definitions of the indicators are given below.
Student Satisfaction
The percentage of positive responses (Agree & Definitely Agree) in EACh of the six question areas (TeACHing, Assessment & Feedback, Academic Support, Organisation & Management, LEArning Resources and Personal DevelOPMent) plus the Overall Satisfaction question were coMBined to provide a composite score and averaged over two years. For institutions where a NSS score does not exist the average of their other scores is used. Source: 2007 & 2008 National Student Survey.
Research Quality
Overall quality of research based on the new 2008 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). The outputs of the RAE gave EACh institution a profile in the following categories: 4* world-LEAding, 3* internationally excellent and 2* internationally recognised (with another two lower categories). The Funding Bodies decided only to fund research in the higher 3 categories, and directed more funds to the very best research by applying weightings: 4* receiving 7 times the weight of 2*, and 3* receiving 3 times the weight of 2*. These weightings have been used in the tables. As an example, in the calculations used a university with 10% of its submitted research at 4* and 90% at 3* would generate an initial score of 3.4 (i.e. 0.1 x 7 + 0.9 x 3). This represents the first stage of the scoring.
Estimations of the eligible staff for each university were made drawing from publicly available data (HESA, 2007/08) that have been quality assured by universities themselves. The eligible staff data include all staff directly responsible for teaching and research (i.e. all ‘teaching and research’ staff, and all ‘teaching only’ staff). Most universities will have submitted at least some ‘research only’ staff, but many staff in that category would not have been eligible for the RAE - to address that effect ‘research only’ staff are included only if they are more senior based on salary levels. An adjustment has also been made to reflect the patterns of staffing in those institutions who carry out further education as well as higher education, with a reduction in the estimation of eligible staff pro rata to their HE student numbers.
The grade shown in the RAE column is the product of these two stages – i.e. the quality score is multiplied by the staff submitted as a proportion of the estimated staff eligible.
Source: Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and HESA 2007/08.
Entry Standards
Mean tarIFF point scores on entry for first year, first degree students under 21 years of age based on A and AS Levels and Highers and Advanced Highers only. Entrants with zero tariffs were excluded from the calculation. Source: HESA 2007/8.
Student-staff ratio
The number of students at each institution as defined in the HESA Session HE and FE populations as an FTE (full-time equivalent) divided by the number of staff FTE based on academic staff including Teaching Only and Teaching & Research staff but excluding Research Only staff. Atypical staff are included in this calculation. Source: HESA 2007/8.
Services and Facilities Spend
A two year average of expenditure on Academic Services and Staff & Student Facilities, divided by the total number of full time equivalent students. Source: HESA 2005/6 and 2006/7.
Completion
Percentage of students projected to leave with a degree including students who transfer to other institutions. The HESA Performance Indicator uses current movements of students to project the eventual outcome. The measure used in the table projects what proportion of students will eventually gain a degree, what proportion will leave their current university or college but transfer into higher education and is presented as a proportion of students with known data. Source: HESA Performance Indicators published June 2008 (table T5 - uses 2006/7 entrant cohort).
Good Honours
The number of students who graduated with a first or upper second class degree as a proportion of the total number of graduates with classified degrees. Enhanced first degrees, such as a MEng gained after four-year engineering course were treated as equivalent to a first or upper second. Source: HESA 2007/8.
Graduate Prospects
Destinations of full-time first degree UK domICIled leavers. The destination categories were based upon a split of SOC 2000 codes for graduates and leavers entering employment, together with type of qualification codes for graduates and leavers entering further study. This split of SOC 2000 codes was derived from Elias & Purcell’s report ‘SOC (HE) A Classification of occupations for studying the graduate labour market’ (Institute for Employment Research, Warwick). This split of SOC 2000 codes produces four categories of graduate level employment (‘Traditional graduate occupations’, ‘Modern graduate occupations’, ‘New graduate occupations’, ‘NIChe graduate occupations’). The data were derived from the HESA Destination of Leavers from HE (DLHE) Record. Source: HESA 2007/8 based on 2007 graduates.
The analysis of the results of the Research Assessment Exercise 2008 makes use of contextual data supplied under contract by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). It is a contractual condition that this statement should be published in conjunction with the analysis.
“HESA holds no data speCIFying which or how many staff have been regarded by each institution as eligible for inclusion in RAE 2008, and no data on the assignment to Units of Assessment of those eligible staff not included. Further, the data that HESA does hold is not an adequate alternative basis on which to estimate eligible staff numbers, whether for an institution as a whole, or disaggregated by Units of Assessment, or by some broader subject-based grouping.”
Subject Tables
Subject tables were based on 4 indicators: Research Quality, Entry Standards and Graduate Prospects and, for the first time, Student Satisfaction. (Education includes a fifth Indicator – the most current teaching training assessments by Ofsted.) Theses were combined using a z-score transformation with equal weighting for the indicators and the totals were transformed to a scale with 100 for the top score.
Student Satisfaction
The percentage of positive responses (Agree & Definitely Agree) in each of the six question areas (Teaching, Assessment & Feedback, Academic Support, Organisation & Management, Learning Resources and Personal DevelOPMent) plus the Overall Satisfaction question were combined to provide a composite score and averaged over two years. This was mapped at 107 subject level to the Times subjects. If a score did not exist at this level then the 41 subject level data was used or, if that did not exist, 19 subject level. For institutions where an NSS score was not present at any of these levels the average score of the other indicators was used. Source: 2007 & 2008 National Student Survey.
Research Quality
Overall quality of research based on the new 2008 Research Assessment Exercise. The output of the RAE gave each institution a profile in the following categories: 4* world-leading, 3* internationally excellent and 2* internationally recognised (with another two lower categories). The Funding Bodies decided only to fund research in the higher 3 categories, and directed more funds to the very best research by applying weightings: 4* receiving 7 times the weight of 2*, and 3* receiving 3 times the weight of 2*. These weightings have been used in the tables. Estimations of the proportion of eligible staff submitted were not sufficiently robust at subject level to be used.
Source: Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE).
Entry Standards
Mean tariff point scores on entry for first year, first degree students under 21 years of age based on A and AS Levels and Highers and Advanced Highers only. Entrants with zero tariffs were excluded from the calculation. Source: HESA 2007/8.
Graduate Prospects
Destinations of full-time first degree UK domiciled leavers aggregated over two years. The destination categories were based upon a split of SOC 2000 codes for graduates and leavers entering employment, together with type of qualification codes for graduates and leavers entering further study. This split of SOC 2000 codes was derived from Elias & Purcell’s report ‘SOC (HE) A Classification of occupations for studying the graduate labour market’ (Institute for Employment Research, Warwick). This split of SOC 2000 codes produces four categories of graduate level employment (‘Traditional graduate occupations’, ‘Modern graduate occupations’, ‘New graduate occupations’, ‘Niche graduate occupations’). The data were derived from the HESA Destination of Leavers from HE (DLHE) Record. Source: HESA 2005/6 and 2006/7.
《泰晤士报》2010年英国大学排行榜榜单
Rank 大学名称 大学名称
(中文)Student
SatisfactionResearch
QualityStudent:
Staff
RatioServices &
Facilities
SpendEntry
StandardsCompletion Good
HonoursGraduate
ProspectsTotal
ScoreMax scores 100% 7 n/a n/a n/a 100 100 100 1000 1 Oxford 牛津大学 85 3.5 10.8 3396 524 97.7 91.1 82.3 1000 2 University of Cambridge 剑桥大学 86 3.7 11.6 2385 539 99 87 85.5 968 3 Imperial College 英国伦敦皇家学院 75 2.7 10.3 3518 489 97.1 68.5 88.4 859 4 St Andrews 圣安德鲁斯大学 84 2.5 12.4 1423 468 94.2 85.1 77.8 792 5 University College London 英国伦敦大学学院 77 2.7 8.9 1784 452 92 80.4 82.9 775 6 University_of_Warwick 华威大学 77 2.4 13.1 2118 463 96 79.7 79.2 772 7 London School of Economics 英国伦敦政治经济学院 73 2.8 13.3 1699 483 96.5 76 90.6 768 8 Durham University 英国杜伦大学 79 2.5 14.8 1578 459 96.7 77.5 78.3 749 9 University of Exeter 埃克塞特大学 85 2.5 17.5 1378 394 94.8 79.4 71.7 723 10 University of Bristol 英国布里斯托大学 74 2.6 13.1 1657 447 95.6 81.5 82 722 11 University of York 英国约克大学 79 2.5 13.1 1534 434 96 74.9 69.4 711 12 King's College London 英国伦敦国王学院 76 2 11.4 1821 415 92.3 72.8 83.2 709 13 University of Bath 巴斯大学 78 2 15 1358 440 95.7 75.1 81.9 705 14 University of EDInburgh 英国爱丁堡大学 74 2.8 12.4 1511 447 90.4 80.6 76.9 704 15 University of Leicester 莱斯特大学 84 1.9 14.7 1489 360 93 71.6 76.2 693 15 University of Southampton 南安普顿大学 78 2 13.9 1562 407 93.7 74.6 76.5 693 17 Loughborough University 拉夫堡大学 85 2.1 17 1340 368 91.3 67.7 75.7 691 18 University of Sheffield 英国谢菲尔德大学 78 2.4 14.2 1191 406 92.1 74.5 79.1 684 19 University of Glasgow 格拉斯哥大学 79 2.2 13.2 1377 412 86.6 71.3 75.4 671 20 University of NOTTingham 英国诺丁汉大学 76 2.1 13.7 1402 408 95.7 74.3 76.3 668 21 Newcastle University 英国纽卡斯尔大学 77 2 14.9 1504 405 92.2 72.2 79.4 664 22 University of Birmingham 英国伯明翰大学 78 2.1 14.9 1552 403 93.6 70.9 72.7 663 23 Lancaster University 兰卡斯特大学 79 2.4 13.7 1407 388 93.3 69.6 64.3 661 24 University of Manchester 英国曼彻斯特大学 73 2.4 13.6 1489 412 91.6 70.4 73.8 641 25 Aston University 阿斯顿大学 80 1.2 16.5 1507 365 91 63.6 78.1 631 26 Cardiff University 英国卡地夫大学 77 1.8 14.7 1177 394 92.4 66.8 77.6 630 27 The University of Leeds 利兹大学 76 2 13.9 1143 392 91.9 73.4 71.1 627 28 The University of LivERPool 利物浦大学 76 1.8 12.2 1273 387 91.2 68.8 72.5 622 28 University of East Anglia 东安格利亚大学 83 1.8 17.1 1231 361 85.4 70.1 71.9 622 30 Royal Holloway College 皇家霍洛威学院 75 2.3 14.5 1308 365 92.9 70.3 69.8 617 31 University of Reading 雷丁大学 79 2.1 16.7 1062 347 91.7 75.4 68.7 612 32 Queen's University of BelFASt 贝尔法斯特女王大学 78 1.7 15.2 1362 358 85 69 78.3 611 33 University of Aberdeen 阿伯丁大学 81 1.9 15.1 1194 363 77.3 67.6 74.4 607 33 School of Oriental and African Studies 伦敦大学亚非学院 72 1.7 10.8 1829 378 82.6 73.2 73.5 607 35 Sussex University 英国苏塞克斯大学 74 2.2 15.5 1117 378 90.1 81.7 70.6 606 36 Queen Mary, University of London 伦敦大学玛丽皇后学院 76 2 13 1161 346 88.5 64.2 77.3 600 37 University of Surrey 萨里大学 76 1.8 16.8 1202 352 88.8 65.1 80 596 37 University of Strathclyde 斯特拉斯克莱德大学 76 1.6 19.1 1344 394 83.1 73.9 78.1 596 39 University of Kent 英国肯特大学 81 1.4 17.1 1148 317 87.8 61.7 71.8 566 40 Heriot-Watt University 英国赫瑞·瓦特大学 75 1.7 15.6 1183 350 80.3 65.5 76.2 558 41 University of Dundee 英国邓迪大学 78 1.5 14 1124 371 71.4 65.8 75.6 554 42 Keele University 基尔大学 77 1.2 14.3 1148 319 89.1 64.4 70.4 552 43 University of Essex 埃塞克斯大学 76 1.8 13.7 1385 302 87.4 61 62.7 550 44 The University of Hull 英国赫尔大学 81 1.1 18.7 1096 285 87 57.7 73.2 530 45 Goldsmiths College, University of London 伦敦大学金史密斯学院 72 2.1 12.7 806 318 85.7 65.2 69 529 46 Aberystwyth, University of Wales 阿伯里斯特维斯大学 81 1.7 17.6 1047 310 87.5 61.1 53 522 47 Brunel University 布鲁内尔大学 72 1.6 17.8 1576 319 86.4 64.9 67.9 516 48 University of Stirling 斯特林大学 76 1.3 14.2 958 288 81.5 联系管理员15775053793
- 版权声明：本站文章如无特别标注，均为本站原创文章，于2022-07-31，由经济百科发表，共 14348个字。
- 转载请注明出处：经济百科，如有疑问，请联系我们
- 本文地址：http://www.dj0415.com/tai-wu-shi-bao2010-n
相关推荐
发表评论